Hard Feedback, Clear Next Steps
Be direct about the work without turning the conversation into a judgment of character.
MT Editors14 juillet 2026 3 min de lecture
Article disponible en anglais.
Prepare the Facts, Not the Verdict
Before giving difficult feedback, identify the specific behaviour, when it occurred and what effect it had. Separate what you observed from what you inferred. A missed handover is discussable; declaring someone careless turns a work issue into a verdict about identity. Check the expected standard and whether it was communicated clearly. Consider your own contribution, including conflicting instructions or missing resources. Choose a private setting and enough time for a real response. Where misconduct, discrimination or formal performance procedures are involved, follow organisational policy and seek appropriate support rather than improvising an informal substitute.
Say the Difficult Part Plainly
State the issue early, with calm language and a concrete example. Explain why it matters without exaggeration or a stack of unrelated complaints. Then ask for the other person’s perspective and listen closely enough to change your understanding. Context may reveal a misunderstanding, a skills gap or a constraint you did not know about; it does not automatically remove accountability. Avoid pretending every issue is merely a question if a requirement is non-negotiable. Equally, do not hide a serious concern inside so much praise that the person leaves unsure whether anything needs to change.
- Address one coherent issue at a time.
- Describe impact without claiming to know intention.
- Distinguish required standards from personal preferences.
Make Improvement Observable
Agree on what should happen differently, how progress will be recognised and when you will review it. Include practical support such as clearer priorities, training or a revised handover process. Ask the person to summarise the plan in their own words so misunderstandings surface before the meeting ends. Document proportionately and according to policy, especially when the issue is part of a formal process. If the conversation becomes heated, pause and arrange a specific time to continue rather than forcing agreement. Follow through on your own commitments; demanding change while withholding promised support makes the standard harder to trust.
Clarity is kinder than leaving someone to guess the standard.
À retenir
- Describe observable behaviour and its impact.
- Ask for context before assuming motive.
- Agree on a specific change, support and a review date.
The Sunday Brief.
Un e-mail par semaine. Le meilleur du style, de l’horlogerie, du whisky, de l’argent et plus encore — en cinq minutes.
Lire la suite
Leadership sous pression : décider quand tout est urgent
Quand chaque message dit « ASAP », le rôle du leader n'est pas d'aller plus vite. C'est de voir plus clair. Un guide de terrain pour les semaines sous tension.
MAN TARGET Editors · 3 min de lecture
Négociation : 7 principes pour obtenir de meilleurs accords au travail et dans la vie
Salaire, contrats, fournisseurs, même le choix des vacances. Négocier est une compétence, pas un trait de caractère. Voici comment l'entraîner.
MAN TARGET Editors · 3 min de lecture
Make the One-to-One Worth Keeping
Give individual meetings a purpose beyond reporting what is already on the board.
MT Editors · 3 min de lecture